ABALX vs FSKAX: 28% overlap

American Funds American Balanced A and Fidelity Total Market Index share 28.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.7Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
28.4%
ABALX expense ratio
0.56%
FSKAX expense ratio
0.01%

Top shared holdings

ABALX and FSKAX hold 122 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ABALXin FSKAXΔ
AVGO3.4%2.3%1.1%
NVDA2.0%6.5%4.5%
MSFT2.0%4.4%2.4%
GOOGL1.7%2.7%1.0%
GOOG1.4%2.2%0.7%
LLY1.3%1.3%0.1%
V1.0%0.8%0.2%
AMZN0.8%3.1%2.3%
META0.7%2.1%1.4%
MU1.3%0.7%0.6%

Where ABALX and FSKAX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorABALXFSKAXΔ
Unclassified22.7%4.0%+18.7pp
Information Technology16.0%29.9%13.9pp
Treasuries12.3%0.0%+12.3pp
Consumer Discretionary4.7%9.6%4.9pp
Communication Services5.1%9.7%4.6pp
Industrials6.0%9.6%3.7pp
Corporate — industrial & other3.6%0.0%+3.6pp
Financials8.9%12.2%3.3pp

Δ is ABALX minus FSKAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ABALX
1,316 positions

54.5% of ABALX by weight, held in no part of FSKAX.

Only in FSKAX
3,631 positions

45.5% of FSKAX by weight, held in no part of ABALX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ABALXFSKAX
Top 10 holdings36.3%32.1%
Positions held1,4393,754
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$56$1

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ABALX and FSKAX overlap?

ABALX and FSKAX overlap 28.4% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 122 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ABALX as of 2026-03-31, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between ABALX and FSKAX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ABALX holds a stock at 6% and FSKAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ABALX and FSKAX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 28.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ABALX own that FSKAX doesn't?

ABALX holds 1,439 positions and FSKAX holds 3,754; 1,316 of ABALX's positions don't appear in FSKAX at all, and they are 54.5% of ABALX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ABALX and FSKAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ABALX vs FSKAX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ABALX as of 2026-03-31, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.