ABALX vs IEMG: 2% overlap

American Funds American Balanced A and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF share 1.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — ABALX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.6%
ABALX expense ratio
0.56%
IEMG expense ratio
0.09%

Top shared holdings

ABALX and IEMG hold 10 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ABALXin IEMGΔ
0006600.7%5.3%4.6%
23300.4%13.4%13.0%
BAP0.2%0.2%0.0%
GMEXICOB0.2%0.3%0.1%
MTN0.0%0.2%0.1%
SCCO0.0%0.1%0.1%
MOH0.1%0.0%0.0%
TEL0.0%0.0%0.0%
SRE0.1%0.0%0.1%
CASH0.0%0.4%0.4%

Where ABALX and IEMG differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorABALXIEMGΔ
Information Technology16.0%39.8%23.8pp
Unclassified22.7%0.0%+22.7pp
Treasuries12.3%0.0%+12.3pp
Financials8.9%18.1%9.2pp
Materials1.9%5.8%3.9pp
Consumer Discretionary4.7%8.5%3.8pp
Health Care6.7%3.1%+3.6pp
Corporate — industrial & other3.6%0.0%+3.6pp

Δ is ABALX minus IEMG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ABALX
1,428 positions

98.9% of ABALX by weight, held in no part of IEMG.

Only in IEMG
2,779 positions

79.4% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of ABALX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ABALXIEMG
Top 10 holdings36.3%33.6%
Positions held1,4392,790
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$56$9

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ABALX and IEMG overlap?

ABALX and IEMG overlap 1.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 10 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ABALX as of 2026-03-31, IEMG as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between ABALX and IEMG calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ABALX holds a stock at 6% and IEMG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ABALX and IEMG?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ABALX own that IEMG doesn't?

ABALX holds 1,439 positions and IEMG holds 2,790; 1,428 of ABALX's positions don't appear in IEMG at all, and they are 98.9% of ABALX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ABALX and IEMG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ABALX vs IEMG

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ABALX as of 2026-03-31, IEMG as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.