ABALX vs RGAGX: 38% overlap

American Funds American Balanced A and American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 share 37.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.6Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.6. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
37.6%
ABALX expense ratio
0.56%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%

Top shared holdings

ABALX and RGAGX hold 99 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ABALXin RGAGXΔ
14020B6.8%3.5%3.3%
AVGO3.4%4.3%0.9%
NVDA2.0%6.1%4.1%
MSFT2.0%4.0%2.0%
GOOGL1.7%2.9%1.2%
GOOG1.4%2.9%1.5%
LLY1.3%3.3%2.0%
MU1.3%1.8%0.5%
VRTX1.0%2.1%1.1%
PM2.2%0.9%1.3%

Where ABALX and RGAGX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorABALXRGAGXΔ
Unclassified22.7%7.6%+15.1pp
Information Technology16.0%30.6%14.6pp
Treasuries12.3%0.0%+12.3pp
Communication Services5.1%13.2%8.1pp
Consumer Discretionary4.7%12.7%7.9pp
Health Care6.7%11.0%4.3pp
Industrials6.0%9.8%3.9pp
Corporate — industrial & other3.6%0.0%+3.5pp

Δ is ABALX minus RGAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ABALX
1,339 positions

45.2% of ABALX by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

Only in RGAGX
209 positions

29.5% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of ABALX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ABALXRGAGX
Top 10 holdings36.3%36.7%
Positions held1,439309
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$56$30

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ABALX and RGAGX overlap?

ABALX and RGAGX overlap 37.6% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 99 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ABALX as of 2026-03-31, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between ABALX and RGAGX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ABALX holds a stock at 6% and RGAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ABALX and RGAGX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 37.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ABALX own that RGAGX doesn't?

ABALX holds 1,439 positions and RGAGX holds 309; 1,339 of ABALX's positions don't appear in RGAGX at all, and they are 45.2% of ABALX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ABALX and RGAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ABALX vs RGAGX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ABALX as of 2026-03-31, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.