ABALX vs TSPC: 31% overlap

American Funds American Balanced A and TSP C Fund — shown via S&P 500 proxy share 30.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — ABALX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.7Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
30.8%
ABALX expense ratio
0.56%
TSPC expense ratio
0.05%

Top shared holdings

ABALX and TSPC hold 120 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ABALXin TSPCΔ
AVGO3.4%2.8%0.6%
NVDA2.0%7.5%5.5%
MSFT2.0%4.3%2.3%
GOOGL1.7%3.2%1.5%
GOOG1.4%2.6%1.2%
LLY1.3%1.5%0.1%
MU1.3%2.0%0.7%
V1.0%0.9%0.2%
AMZN0.8%3.6%2.8%
META0.7%1.9%1.2%

Where ABALX and TSPC differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorABALXTSPCΔ
Unclassified22.7%0.0%+22.7pp
Information Technology16.0%38.0%22.0pp
Treasuries12.3%0.0%+12.3pp
Communication Services5.1%9.7%4.6pp
Consumer Discretionary4.7%9.3%4.6pp
Corporate — industrial & other3.6%0.0%+3.6pp
Industrials6.0%8.9%3.0pp
MBS Pass-Through2.7%0.0%+2.7pp

Δ is ABALX minus TSPC, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ABALX
1,318 positions

54.3% of ABALX by weight, held in no part of TSPC.

Only in TSPC
385 positions

36.3% of TSPC by weight, held in no part of ABALX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ABALXTSPC
Top 10 holdings36.3%36.4%
Positions held1,439505
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$56$5

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ABALX and TSPC overlap?

ABALX and TSPC overlap 30.8% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 120 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ABALX as of 2026-03-31, TSPC as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between ABALX and TSPC calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ABALX holds a stock at 6% and TSPC holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ABALX and TSPC?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 30.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ABALX own that TSPC doesn't?

ABALX holds 1,439 positions and TSPC holds 505; 1,318 of ABALX's positions don't appear in TSPC at all, and they are 54.3% of ABALX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ABALX and TSPC. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ABALX vs TSPC

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ABALX as of 2026-03-31, TSPC as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.