ABALX vs XLC: 5% overlap

American Funds American Balanced A and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund share 5.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — ABALX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
5.1%
ABALX expense ratio
0.56%
XLC expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

ABALX and XLC hold 8 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ABALXin XLCΔ
GOOGL1.7%10.1%8.3%
GOOG1.4%8.1%6.7%
META0.7%18.5%17.8%
CMCSA0.5%4.2%3.7%
NFLX0.3%4.3%4.0%
DIS0.2%4.3%4.1%
T0.2%4.9%4.7%
CASH0.0%0.2%0.2%

Where ABALX and XLC differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorABALXXLCΔ
Communication Services5.1%99.8%94.7pp
Unclassified22.7%0.0%+22.7pp
Information Technology16.0%0.0%+16.0pp
Treasuries12.3%0.0%+12.3pp
Financials8.9%0.0%+8.9pp
Health Care6.7%0.0%+6.7pp
Industrials6.0%0.0%+6.0pp
Consumer Discretionary4.7%0.0%+4.7pp

Δ is ABALX minus XLC, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ABALX
1,430 positions

95.6% of ABALX by weight, held in no part of XLC.

Only in XLC
16 positions

45.5% of XLC by weight, held in no part of ABALX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ABALXXLC
Top 10 holdings36.3%68.6%
Positions held1,43925
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$56$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ABALX and XLC overlap?

ABALX and XLC overlap 5.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 8 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ABALX as of 2026-03-31, XLC as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between ABALX and XLC calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ABALX holds a stock at 6% and XLC holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ABALX and XLC?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 5.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ABALX own that XLC doesn't?

ABALX holds 1,439 positions and XLC holds 25; 1,430 of ABALX's positions don't appear in XLC at all, and they are 95.6% of ABALX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ABALX and XLC. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ABALX vs XLC

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ABALX as of 2026-03-31, XLC as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.