ABALX vs XLF: 6% overlap
American Funds American Balanced A and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund share 5.7% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — ABALX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
ABALX and XLF hold 25 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in ABALX | in XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| V | 1.0% | 7.4% | 6.4% |
| AON | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% |
| BAC | 0.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| PGR | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| CB | 0.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| JPM | 0.4% | 11.9% | 11.5% |
| SYF | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| COF | 0.3% | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| C | 0.3% | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| AJG | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% |
Where ABALX and XLF differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | ABALX | XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 8.9% | 99.9% | −91.0pp |
| Unclassified | 22.7% | 0.0% | +22.7pp |
| Information Technology | 16.0% | 0.0% | +16.0pp |
| Treasuries | 12.3% | 0.0% | +12.3pp |
| Health Care | 6.7% | 0.0% | +6.7pp |
| Industrials | 6.0% | 0.0% | +6.0pp |
| Communication Services | 5.1% | 0.0% | +5.1pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.7% | 0.0% | +4.7pp |
Δ is ABALX minus XLF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
94.8% of ABALX by weight, held in no part of XLF.
41.0% of XLF by weight, held in no part of ABALX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| ABALX | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 36.3% | 57.0% |
| Positions held | 1,439 | 78 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $56 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do ABALX and XLF overlap?
ABALX and XLF overlap 5.7% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 25 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ABALX as of 2026-03-31, XLF as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between ABALX and XLF calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ABALX holds a stock at 6% and XLF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both ABALX and XLF?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 5.7% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does ABALX own that XLF doesn't?
ABALX holds 1,439 positions and XLF holds 78; 1,413 of ABALX's positions don't appear in XLF at all, and they are 94.8% of ABALX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares ABALX and XLF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch ABALX vs XLF
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, ABALX as of 2026-03-31, XLF as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.