AGTHX vs RGAGX: 99% overlap

American Funds Growth Fund of America A and American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 share 98.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
1.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
98.9%
AGTHX expense ratio
0.61%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%

Top shared holdings

AGTHX and RGAGX hold 308 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin AGTHXin RGAGXΔ
NVDA6.1%6.1%0.0%
AVGO4.3%4.3%0.0%
META4.2%4.2%0.0%
MSFT4.0%4.0%0.0%
14020B3.5%3.5%0.0%
LLY3.3%3.3%0.0%
GOOG2.9%2.9%0.0%
GOOGL2.9%2.9%0.0%
AMZN2.9%2.9%0.0%
TSLA2.6%2.6%0.0%

Where AGTHX and RGAGX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorAGTHXRGAGXΔ
Information Technology30.6%30.6%+0.0pp
Consumer Discretionary12.7%12.7%+0.0pp
Industrials9.8%9.8%+0.0pp
Communication Services13.2%13.2%+0.0pp
Unclassified7.6%7.6%+0.0pp
Health Care11.0%11.0%+0.0pp
Cash & Other1.2%1.2%+0.0pp
Consumer Staples2.4%2.4%+0.0pp

Δ is AGTHX minus RGAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in AGTHX
0 positions

0.0% of AGTHX by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

Only in RGAGX
0 positions

0.0% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of AGTHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

AGTHXRGAGX
Top 10 holdings36.7%36.7%
Positions held309309
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$61$30

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do AGTHX and RGAGX overlap?

AGTHX and RGAGX overlap 98.9% by portfolio weight — they are effectively the same fund. They share 308 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AGTHX as of 2026-02-28, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between AGTHX and RGAGX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AGTHX holds a stock at 6% and RGAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both AGTHX and RGAGX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 98.9% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: AGTHX 0.61% versus RGAGX 0.30%.

What does AGTHX own that RGAGX doesn't?

AGTHX holds 309 positions and RGAGX holds 309; 0 of AGTHX's positions don't appear in RGAGX at all, and they are 0.0% of AGTHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares AGTHX and RGAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch AGTHX vs RGAGX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, AGTHX as of 2026-02-28, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.