ANCFX vs RGAGX: 57% overlap

American Funds Fundamental Investors A and American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 share 56.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.4Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.4. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
56.8%
ANCFX expense ratio
0.61%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%

Top shared holdings

ANCFX and RGAGX hold 140 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ANCFXin RGAGXΔ
AVGO5.9%4.3%1.7%
MSFT4.5%4.0%0.5%
NVDA3.6%6.1%2.5%
GOOG3.6%2.9%0.7%
14020B2.8%3.5%0.6%
AMZN2.8%2.9%0.1%
META2.3%4.2%1.9%
23302.2%2.3%0.1%
MU2.1%1.8%0.4%
GOOGL1.6%2.9%1.3%

Where ANCFX and RGAGX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorANCFXRGAGXΔ
Consumer Staples9.4%2.4%+7.0pp
Health Care6.2%11.0%4.8pp
Communication Services9.0%13.2%4.3pp
Consumer Discretionary8.9%12.7%3.8pp
Information Technology27.8%30.6%2.7pp
Industrials12.0%9.8%+2.2pp
Unclassified9.3%7.6%+1.7pp
Financials8.1%6.5%+1.6pp

Δ is ANCFX minus RGAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ANCFX
92 positions

18.7% of ANCFX by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

Only in RGAGX
168 positions

16.5% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of ANCFX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ANCFXRGAGX
Top 10 holdings34.1%36.7%
Positions held233309
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$61$30

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ANCFX and RGAGX overlap?

ANCFX and RGAGX overlap 56.8% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 140 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between ANCFX and RGAGX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ANCFX holds a stock at 6% and RGAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ANCFX and RGAGX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 56.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ANCFX own that RGAGX doesn't?

ANCFX holds 233 positions and RGAGX holds 309; 92 of ANCFX's positions don't appear in RGAGX at all, and they are 18.7% of ANCFX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ANCFX and RGAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ANCFX vs RGAGX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.