ANCFX vs SCHF: 2% overlap
American Funds Fundamental Investors A and Schwab International Equity ETF share 2.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-05-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
ANCFX and SCHF hold 11 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in ANCFX | in SCHF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| BN | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| CNQ | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| WPM | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| CSU | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| WCN | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| CVE | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| B | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| QSR | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| FM | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Where ANCFX and SCHF differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | ANCFX | SCHF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 9.3% | 95.9% | −86.6pp |
| Information Technology | 27.8% | 0.0% | +27.8pp |
| Industrials | 12.0% | 0.3% | +11.7pp |
| Consumer Staples | 9.4% | 0.5% | +8.9pp |
| Communication Services | 9.0% | 0.2% | +8.8pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.9% | 0.2% | +8.7pp |
| Financials | 8.1% | 1.9% | +6.2pp |
| Health Care | 6.2% | 0.0% | +6.2pp |
Δ is ANCFX minus SCHF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
94.8% of ANCFX by weight, held in no part of SCHF.
97.7% of SCHF by weight, held in no part of ANCFX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| ANCFX | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 34.1% | 14.8% |
| Positions held | 233 | 1,477 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $61 | $6 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do ANCFX and SCHF overlap?
ANCFX and SCHF overlap 2.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 11 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, SCHF as of 2026-05-31).
How is the overlap between ANCFX and SCHF calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ANCFX holds a stock at 6% and SCHF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both ANCFX and SCHF?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does ANCFX own that SCHF doesn't?
ANCFX holds 233 positions and SCHF holds 1,477; 221 of ANCFX's positions don't appear in SCHF at all, and they are 94.8% of ANCFX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares ANCFX and SCHF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch ANCFX vs SCHF
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, SCHF as of 2026-05-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.