ANCFX vs VB: 5% overlap

American Funds Fundamental Investors A and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF share 4.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
4.8%
ANCFX expense ratio
0.61%
VB expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

ANCFX and VB hold 43 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ANCFXin VBΔ
ATO0.4%0.3%0.0%
FTAI0.8%0.3%0.5%
XPO0.3%0.3%0.0%
LII0.2%0.2%0.0%
ITT0.5%0.2%0.3%
RGLD0.3%0.2%0.1%
PFGC0.6%0.2%0.4%
BG0.4%0.2%0.2%
JAZZ0.3%0.2%0.1%
RNR0.3%0.2%0.1%

Where ANCFX and VB differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorANCFXVBΔ
Information Technology27.8%16.1%+11.7pp
Industrials12.0%21.0%9.0pp
Unclassified9.3%0.6%+8.7pp
Communication Services9.0%3.0%+5.9pp
Consumer Staples9.4%3.5%+5.9pp
Health Care6.2%11.9%5.7pp
Real Estate1.8%7.1%5.3pp
Financials8.1%12.7%4.6pp

Δ is ANCFX minus VB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ANCFX
189 positions

91.5% of ANCFX by weight, held in no part of VB.

Only in VB
1,265 positions

93.8% of VB by weight, held in no part of ANCFX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ANCFXVB
Top 10 holdings34.1%5.6%
Positions held2331,308
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$61$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ANCFX and VB overlap?

ANCFX and VB overlap 4.8% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 43 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, VB as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between ANCFX and VB calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ANCFX holds a stock at 6% and VB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ANCFX and VB?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 4.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does ANCFX own that VB doesn't?

ANCFX holds 233 positions and VB holds 1,308; 189 of ANCFX's positions don't appear in VB at all, and they are 91.5% of ANCFX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ANCFX and VB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ANCFX vs VB

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ANCFX as of 2026-03-31, VB as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.