AVDV vs RGAGX: 1% overlap
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF and American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 share 0.7% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AVDV and RGAGX hold 9 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AVDV | in RGAGX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSG | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| RMS | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| AIR | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| OVV | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| EFX | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| FM | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| COST | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| FND | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| DOCS | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where AVDV and RGAGX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AVDV | RGAGX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 4.8% | 30.6% | −25.8pp |
| Materials | 15.6% | 1.5% | +14.1pp |
| Unclassified | 20.7% | 7.6% | +13.1pp |
| Communication Services | 1.8% | 13.2% | −11.4pp |
| Health Care | 1.8% | 11.0% | −9.1pp |
| Industrials | 18.9% | 9.8% | +9.1pp |
| Financials | 14.1% | 6.5% | +7.6pp |
| Energy | 5.1% | 1.9% | +3.2pp |
Δ is AVDV minus RGAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.6% of AVDV by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.
97.5% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of AVDV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AVDV | RGAGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 9.0% | 36.7% |
| Positions held | 1,646 | 309 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $36 | $30 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AVDV and RGAGX overlap?
AVDV and RGAGX overlap 0.7% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 9 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AVDV as of 2026-02-28, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28).
How is the overlap between AVDV and RGAGX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AVDV holds a stock at 6% and RGAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AVDV and RGAGX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.7% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AVDV own that RGAGX doesn't?
AVDV holds 1,646 positions and RGAGX holds 309; 1,637 of AVDV's positions don't appear in RGAGX at all, and they are 99.6% of AVDV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AVDV and RGAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AVDV vs RGAGX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AVDV as of 2026-02-28, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.