AVUV vs IEFA: 1% overlap
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF share 0.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — AVUV as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AVUV and IEFA hold 32 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AVUV | in IEFA | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| EBS | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| TRN | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| SIG | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| CASH | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| AM | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| PLUS | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| LEG | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| WOR | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| BC | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Where AVUV and IEFA differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AVUV | IEFA | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 16.8% | 3.9% | +13.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.9% | 8.8% | +8.1pp |
| Information Technology | 5.4% | 11.9% | −6.5pp |
| Health Care | 3.5% | 7.6% | −4.1pp |
| Unclassified | 3.5% | 0.0% | +3.5pp |
| Utilities | 0.9% | 4.2% | −3.3pp |
| Consumer Staples | 3.8% | 6.7% | −2.9pp |
| Industrials | 17.3% | 19.6% | −2.2pp |
Δ is AVUV minus IEFA, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
94.1% of AVUV by weight, held in no part of IEFA.
98.7% of IEFA by weight, held in no part of AVUV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AVUV | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 8.5% | 12.5% |
| Positions held | 774 | 2,567 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $25 | $7 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AVUV and IEFA overlap?
AVUV and IEFA overlap 0.5% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 32 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AVUV as of 2026-02-28, IEFA as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between AVUV and IEFA calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AVUV holds a stock at 6% and IEFA holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AVUV and IEFA?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AVUV own that IEFA doesn't?
AVUV holds 774 positions and IEFA holds 2,567; 742 of AVUV's positions don't appear in IEFA at all, and they are 94.1% of AVUV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AVUV and IEFA. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AVUV vs IEFA
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AVUV as of 2026-02-28, IEFA as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.