AVUV vs IEMG: 1% overlap
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF share 0.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — AVUV as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AVUV and IEMG hold 15 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AVUV | in IEMG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| VAL | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| ABG | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| SLM | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.3% |
| RES | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| SM | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| AMR | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| INR | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| HCC | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| ALG | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Where AVUV and IEMG differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AVUV | IEMG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 5.4% | 39.8% | −34.4pp |
| Energy | 16.8% | 3.5% | +13.4pp |
| Industrials | 17.3% | 7.7% | +9.6pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.9% | 8.5% | +8.4pp |
| Financials | 24.1% | 18.1% | +6.0pp |
| Unclassified | 3.5% | 0.0% | +3.5pp |
| Communication Services | 2.3% | 5.4% | −3.1pp |
| Materials | 4.4% | 5.8% | −1.4pp |
Δ is AVUV minus IEMG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
95.5% of AVUV by weight, held in no part of IEMG.
98.5% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of AVUV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AVUV | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 8.5% | 33.6% |
| Positions held | 774 | 2,790 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $25 | $9 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AVUV and IEMG overlap?
AVUV and IEMG overlap 0.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 15 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AVUV as of 2026-02-28, IEMG as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between AVUV and IEMG calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AVUV holds a stock at 6% and IEMG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AVUV and IEMG?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AVUV own that IEMG doesn't?
AVUV holds 774 positions and IEMG holds 2,790; 759 of AVUV's positions don't appear in IEMG at all, and they are 95.5% of AVUV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AVUV and IEMG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AVUV vs IEMG
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AVUV as of 2026-02-28, IEMG as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.