AVUV vs RGAGX: 0% overlap
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AVUV and RGAGX hold 2 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AVUV | in RGAGX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| GLXY | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where AVUV and RGAGX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AVUV | RGAGX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 5.4% | 30.6% | −25.2pp |
| Financials | 24.1% | 6.5% | +17.6pp |
| Energy | 16.8% | 1.9% | +14.9pp |
| Communication Services | 2.3% | 13.2% | −10.9pp |
| Industrials | 17.3% | 9.8% | +7.5pp |
| Health Care | 3.5% | 11.0% | −7.5pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.9% | 12.7% | +4.2pp |
| Unclassified | 3.5% | 7.6% | −4.1pp |
Δ is AVUV minus RGAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.7% of AVUV by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.
98.8% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of AVUV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AVUV | RGAGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 8.5% | 36.7% |
| Positions held | 774 | 309 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $25 | $30 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AVUV and RGAGX overlap?
AVUV and RGAGX overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 2 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AVUV as of 2026-02-28, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28).
How is the overlap between AVUV and RGAGX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AVUV holds a stock at 6% and RGAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AVUV and RGAGX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AVUV own that RGAGX doesn't?
AVUV holds 774 positions and RGAGX holds 309; 772 of AVUV's positions don't appear in RGAGX at all, and they are 99.7% of AVUV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AVUV and RGAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AVUV vs RGAGX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AVUV as of 2026-02-28, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.