AWSHX vs IWM: 0% overlap

American Funds Washington Mutual A and iShares Russell 2000 ETF share 0.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — AWSHX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.1%
AWSHX expense ratio
0.57%
IWM expense ratio
0.19%

Top shared holdings

AWSHX and IWM hold 2 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin AWSHXin IWMΔ
FUL0.0%0.1%0.1%
CASH0.0%0.2%0.1%

Where AWSHX and IWM differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorAWSHXIWMΔ
Health Care10.7%19.9%9.1pp
Information Technology21.9%12.8%+9.0pp
Unclassified7.9%0.0%+7.9pp
Consumer Staples7.0%2.2%+4.9pp
Financials15.0%19.0%4.1pp
Communication Services6.1%2.5%+3.6pp
Industrials11.7%14.7%2.9pp
Energy3.3%6.1%2.8pp

Δ is AWSHX minus IWM, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in AWSHX
195 positions

99.5% of AWSHX by weight, held in no part of IWM.

Only in IWM
1,964 positions

99.8% of IWM by weight, held in no part of AWSHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

AWSHXIWM
Top 10 holdings29.9%3.3%
Positions held1971,967
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$57$19

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do AWSHX and IWM overlap?

AWSHX and IWM overlap 0.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 2 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AWSHX as of 2026-04-30, IWM as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between AWSHX and IWM calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AWSHX holds a stock at 6% and IWM holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both AWSHX and IWM?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does AWSHX own that IWM doesn't?

AWSHX holds 197 positions and IWM holds 1,967; 195 of AWSHX's positions don't appear in IWM at all, and they are 99.5% of AWSHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares AWSHX and IWM. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch AWSHX vs IWM

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, AWSHX as of 2026-04-30, IWM as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.