AWSHX vs VB: 2% overlap

American Funds Washington Mutual A and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF share 2.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — AWSHX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
2.2%
AWSHX expense ratio
0.57%
VB expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

AWSHX and VB hold 23 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin AWSHXin VBΔ
LII0.4%0.2%0.2%
ITT0.2%0.2%0.0%
RGLD0.2%0.2%0.0%
WSO0.3%0.2%0.2%
TXRH0.1%0.2%0.0%
CG0.1%0.1%0.0%
IP0.1%0.1%0.0%
ILMN0.1%0.3%0.2%
ATO0.1%0.3%0.2%
EQH0.1%0.1%0.0%

Where AWSHX and VB differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorAWSHXVBΔ
Industrials11.7%21.0%9.3pp
Unclassified7.9%0.6%+7.3pp
Information Technology21.9%16.1%+5.8pp
Real Estate3.3%7.1%3.8pp
Consumer Staples7.0%3.5%+3.5pp
Materials2.0%5.3%3.3pp
Communication Services6.1%3.0%+3.1pp
Consumer Discretionary6.9%9.9%3.1pp

Δ is AWSHX minus VB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in AWSHX
174 positions

96.9% of AWSHX by weight, held in no part of VB.

Only in VB
1,285 positions

95.0% of VB by weight, held in no part of AWSHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

AWSHXVB
Top 10 holdings29.9%5.6%
Positions held1971,308
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$57$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do AWSHX and VB overlap?

AWSHX and VB overlap 2.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 23 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AWSHX as of 2026-04-30, VB as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between AWSHX and VB calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AWSHX holds a stock at 6% and VB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both AWSHX and VB?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does AWSHX own that VB doesn't?

AWSHX holds 197 positions and VB holds 1,308; 174 of AWSHX's positions don't appear in VB at all, and they are 96.9% of AWSHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares AWSHX and VB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch AWSHX vs VB

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, AWSHX as of 2026-04-30, VB as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.