BIV vs BNDX: 2% overlap

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF share 2.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
2.2%
BIV expense ratio
0.03%
BNDX expense ratio
0.07%

Top shared holdings

BIV and BNDX hold 109 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin BIVin BNDXΔ
CASH0.3%1.3%1.1%
6832340.2%0.1%0.1%
02079K0.2%0.1%0.1%
92343V0.4%0.1%0.3%
0231350.4%0.1%0.2%
1107090.1%0.2%0.1%
91087B0.5%0.1%0.4%
00206R0.3%0.1%0.3%
4592000.1%0.1%0.0%
0130510.0%0.1%0.1%

Where BIV and BNDX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorBIVBNDXΔ
Unclassified0.2%88.4%88.3pp
Treasuries55.9%0.0%+55.9pp
Corporate — industrial & other20.2%2.0%+18.2pp
Financials14.3%2.0%+12.3pp
Utilities3.9%0.2%+3.6pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.3%1.4%1.1pp
Supranational1.8%0.8%+1.0pp
Energy0.0%0.7%0.7pp

Δ is BIV minus BNDX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in BIV
745 positions

89.2% of BIV by weight, held in no part of BNDX.

Only in BNDX
3,006 positions

96.3% of BNDX by weight, held in no part of BIV.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

BIVBNDX
Top 10 holdings62.1%24.4%
Positions held8543,115
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$7

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do BIV and BNDX overlap?

BIV and BNDX overlap 2.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 109 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BIV as of 2026-06-30, BNDX as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between BIV and BNDX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BIV holds a stock at 6% and BNDX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both BIV and BNDX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does BIV own that BNDX doesn't?

BIV holds 854 positions and BNDX holds 3,115; 745 of BIV's positions don't appear in BNDX at all, and they are 89.2% of BIV by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares BIV and BNDX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch BIV vs BNDX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, BIV as of 2026-06-30, BNDX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.