BIV vs IEMG: 0% overlap
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF share 0.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 27 days apart — BIV as of 2026-06-30, the rest through 2026-07-27. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
BIV and IEMG hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in BIV | in IEMG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% |
Where BIV and IEMG differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | BIV | IEMG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treasuries | 55.9% | 0.0% | +55.9pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 39.0% | −39.0pp |
| Corporate — industrial & other | 20.2% | 0.0% | +20.2pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 8.6% | −8.6pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 7.7% | −7.7pp |
| Materials | 0.0% | 5.8% | −5.8pp |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 5.5% | −5.5pp |
| Financials | 14.3% | 18.6% | −4.3pp |
Δ is BIV minus IEMG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.7% of BIV by weight, held in no part of IEMG.
98.8% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of BIV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| BIV | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 62.1% | 33.0% |
| Positions held | 854 | 2,828 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $9 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do BIV and IEMG overlap?
BIV and IEMG overlap 0.3% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BIV as of 2026-06-30, IEMG as of 2026-07-27).
How is the overlap between BIV and IEMG calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BIV holds a stock at 6% and IEMG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both BIV and IEMG?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.3% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does BIV own that IEMG doesn't?
BIV holds 854 positions and IEMG holds 2,828; 853 of BIV's positions don't appear in IEMG at all, and they are 99.7% of BIV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares BIV and IEMG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch BIV vs IEMG
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, BIV as of 2026-06-30, IEMG as of 2026-07-27. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.