BND vs BNDX: 3% overlap

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF share 3.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
3.0%
BND expense ratio
0.03%
BNDX expense ratio
0.07%

Top shared holdings

BND and BNDX hold 129 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin BNDin BNDXΔ
CASH1.1%1.3%0.2%
02079K0.1%0.1%0.0%
92343V0.2%0.1%0.1%
0231350.3%0.1%0.2%
91087B0.3%0.1%0.2%
6832340.1%0.1%0.0%
00206R0.3%0.1%0.2%
4592000.1%0.1%0.0%
1107090.0%0.2%0.1%
7561090.0%0.0%0.0%

Where BND and BNDX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorBNDBNDXΔ
Unclassified0.7%88.4%87.7pp
Treasuries48.2%0.0%+48.2pp
MBS Pass-Through20.3%0.0%+20.3pp
Corporate — industrial & other14.6%2.0%+12.7pp
Financials7.9%2.0%+5.9pp
Utilities2.6%0.2%+2.4pp
Sovereign1.2%2.3%1.2pp
Energy0.0%0.7%0.7pp

Δ is BND minus BNDX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in BND
1,918 positions

91.9% of BND by weight, held in no part of BNDX.

Only in BNDX
2,986 positions

93.9% of BNDX by weight, held in no part of BND.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

BNDBNDX
Top 10 holdings71.7%24.4%
Positions held2,0473,115
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$7

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do BND and BNDX overlap?

BND and BNDX overlap 3.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 129 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BND as of 2026-06-30, BNDX as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between BND and BNDX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BND holds a stock at 6% and BNDX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both BND and BNDX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 3.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does BND own that BNDX doesn't?

BND holds 2,047 positions and BNDX holds 3,115; 1,918 of BND's positions don't appear in BNDX at all, and they are 91.9% of BND by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares BND and BNDX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch BND vs BNDX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, BND as of 2026-06-30, BNDX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.