BNDX vs FIPFX: 0% overlap
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FIPFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
BNDX and FIPFX hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in BNDX | in FIPFX | Δ |
|---|
Where BNDX and FIPFX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | BNDX | FIPFX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 88.4% | 100.0% | −11.6pp |
| Sovereign | 2.3% | 0.0% | +2.3pp |
| Financials | 2.0% | 0.0% | +2.0pp |
| Corporate — industrial & other | 2.0% | 0.0% | +2.0pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 1.4% | 0.0% | +1.4pp |
| Supranational | 0.8% | 0.0% | +0.8pp |
| Local Authority | 0.7% | 0.0% | +0.7pp |
| Energy | 0.7% | 0.0% | +0.7pp |
Δ is BNDX minus FIPFX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
100.0% of BNDX by weight, held in no part of FIPFX.
100.0% of FIPFX by weight, held in no part of BNDX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| BNDX | FIPFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 24.4% | 100.0% |
| Positions held | 3,115 | 5 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $7 | $12 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do BNDX and FIPFX overlap?
BNDX and FIPFX overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BNDX as of 2026-06-30, FIPFX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between BNDX and FIPFX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BNDX holds a stock at 6% and FIPFX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both BNDX and FIPFX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does BNDX own that FIPFX doesn't?
BNDX holds 3,115 positions and FIPFX holds 5; 3,115 of BNDX's positions don't appear in FIPFX at all, and they are 100.0% of BNDX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares BNDX and FIPFX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch BNDX vs FIPFX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, BNDX as of 2026-06-30, FIPFX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.