BSV vs TSPF: 58% overlap

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and TSP F Fund — shown via aggregate-bond proxy share 58.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published 27 days apart — BSV as of 2026-06-30, the rest through 2026-07-27. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.4Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.4. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
58.1%
BSV expense ratio
0.03%
TSPF expense ratio
0.05%

Top shared holdings

BSV and TSPF hold 943 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin BSVin TSPFΔ
UST-3-10Y28.5%21.0%7.5%
UST-0-3Y40.9%16.1%24.8%
CASH0.7%2.9%2.2%
46647P0.7%0.5%0.2%
06051G0.6%0.5%0.0%
38141G0.4%0.3%0.1%
4590580.6%0.3%0.4%
95000U0.4%0.3%0.1%
4042800.4%0.3%0.1%
61747Y0.3%0.3%0.0%

Where BSV and TSPF differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorBSVTSPFΔ
MBS Pass-Through0.2%24.1%24.0pp
Treasuries69.4%46.5%+22.9pp
Cash & Other0.0%-2.3%+2.3pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.7%2.9%2.2pp
Financials10.0%8.0%+2.0pp
Corporate — industrial & other12.6%14.3%1.6pp
Supranational2.5%0.9%+1.6pp
Agency1.2%0.4%+0.8pp

Δ is BSV minus TSPF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in BSV
17 positions

0.2% of BSV by weight, held in no part of TSPF.

Only in TSPF
921 positions

13.2% of TSPF by weight, held in no part of BSV.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

BSVTSPF
Top 10 holdings73.8%75.5%
Positions held9601,865
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$5

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do BSV and TSPF overlap?

BSV and TSPF overlap 58.1% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 943 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BSV as of 2026-06-30, TSPF as of 2026-07-27).

How is the overlap between BSV and TSPF calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BSV holds a stock at 6% and TSPF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both BSV and TSPF?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 58.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does BSV own that TSPF doesn't?

BSV holds 960 positions and TSPF holds 1,865; 17 of BSV's positions don't appear in TSPF at all, and they are 0.2% of BSV by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares BSV and TSPF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch BSV vs TSPF

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, BSV as of 2026-06-30, TSPF as of 2026-07-27. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.