BSV vs VCIT: 21% overlap

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF share 21.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
1.8Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
21.1%
BSV expense ratio
0.03%
VCIT expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

BSV and VCIT hold 616 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin BSVin VCITΔ
46647P0.7%2.7%2.0%
06051G0.6%2.4%1.8%
38141G0.4%1.6%1.2%
4042800.4%1.6%1.2%
95000U0.4%1.6%1.2%
61747Y0.3%2.0%1.7%
37045X0.3%0.5%0.2%
1729670.3%1.0%0.7%
0231350.2%1.0%0.7%
06738E0.2%0.8%0.5%

Where BSV and VCIT differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorBSVVCITΔ
Treasuries69.4%0.0%+69.4pp
Corporate — industrial & other12.6%52.7%40.1pp
Financials10.0%36.8%26.7pp
Utilities1.8%10.0%8.2pp
Supranational2.5%0.0%+2.5pp
Agency1.2%0.0%+1.2pp
Sovereign0.8%0.0%+0.8pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.7%0.1%+0.6pp

Δ is BSV minus VCIT, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in BSV
344 positions

49.4% of BSV by weight, held in no part of VCIT.

Only in VCIT
208 positions

7.8% of VCIT by weight, held in no part of BSV.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

BSVVCIT
Top 10 holdings73.8%16.6%
Positions held960824
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do BSV and VCIT overlap?

BSV and VCIT overlap 21.1% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 616 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BSV as of 2026-06-30, VCIT as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between BSV and VCIT calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BSV holds a stock at 6% and VCIT holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both BSV and VCIT?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 21.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does BSV own that VCIT doesn't?

BSV holds 960 positions and VCIT holds 824; 344 of BSV's positions don't appear in VCIT at all, and they are 49.4% of BSV by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares BSV and VCIT. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch BSV vs VCIT

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, BSV as of 2026-06-30, VCIT as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.