EFA vs FSKAX: 1% overlap

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Fidelity Total Market Index share 0.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.8%
EFA expense ratio
0.33%
FSKAX expense ratio
0.01%

Top shared holdings

EFA and FSKAX hold 40 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin EFAin FSKAXΔ
MRK0.1%0.5%0.4%
ALL0.1%0.1%0.0%
EQT0.1%0.1%0.0%
ROP1.4%0.1%1.3%
PRU0.2%0.1%0.1%
DG0.3%0.1%0.2%
HBAN0.1%0.1%0.0%
ADM0.1%0.0%0.0%
DTE0.5%0.0%0.4%
TSCO0.2%0.0%0.1%

Where EFA and FSKAX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorEFAFSKAXΔ
Information Technology12.0%29.9%17.9pp
Financials25.8%12.2%+13.6pp
Industrials19.0%9.6%+9.4pp
Communication Services3.1%9.7%6.6pp
Materials5.8%1.8%+4.0pp
Unclassified0.0%4.0%4.0pp
Utilities4.5%2.4%+2.1pp
Consumer Staples7.0%5.1%+1.9pp

Δ is EFA minus FSKAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in EFA
637 positions

92.2% of EFA by weight, held in no part of FSKAX.

Only in FSKAX
3,713 positions

98.4% of FSKAX by weight, held in no part of EFA.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

EFAFSKAX
Top 10 holdings14.5%32.1%
Positions held6783,754
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$33$1

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do EFA and FSKAX overlap?

EFA and FSKAX overlap 0.8% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 40 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (EFA as of 2026-07-23, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between EFA and FSKAX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If EFA holds a stock at 6% and FSKAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both EFA and FSKAX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does EFA own that FSKAX doesn't?

EFA holds 678 positions and FSKAX holds 3,754; 637 of EFA's positions don't appear in FSKAX at all, and they are 92.2% of EFA by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares EFA and FSKAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch EFA vs FSKAX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, EFA as of 2026-07-23, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.