EFA vs IJH: 1% overlap

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF share 1.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.4%
EFA expense ratio
0.33%
IJH expense ratio
0.05%

Top shared holdings

EFA and IJH hold 10 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin EFAin IJHΔ
CFR0.6%0.3%0.3%
AAL0.2%0.3%0.0%
ALV0.8%0.2%0.6%
CSL0.2%0.4%0.2%
ORA0.2%0.2%0.0%
G0.2%0.1%0.1%
NXT0.1%0.4%0.3%
CASH0.0%0.1%0.1%
CAR0.0%0.1%0.0%
AM0.0%0.2%0.2%

Where EFA and IJH differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorEFAIJHΔ
Financials25.8%15.1%+10.7pp
Industrials19.0%25.5%6.5pp
Real Estate1.6%6.9%5.3pp
Consumer Staples7.0%3.1%+3.9pp
Health Care8.0%10.0%2.0pp
Consumer Discretionary8.3%10.3%2.0pp
Information Technology12.0%13.9%1.9pp
Communication Services3.1%1.5%+1.6pp

Δ is EFA minus IJH, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in EFA
667 positions

97.2% of EFA by weight, held in no part of IJH.

Only in IJH
393 positions

97.7% of IJH by weight, held in no part of EFA.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

EFAIJH
Top 10 holdings14.5%7.6%
Positions held678404
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$33$5

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do EFA and IJH overlap?

EFA and IJH overlap 1.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 10 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (EFA as of 2026-07-23, IJH as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between EFA and IJH calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If EFA holds a stock at 6% and IJH holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both EFA and IJH?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does EFA own that IJH doesn't?

EFA holds 678 positions and IJH holds 404; 667 of EFA's positions don't appear in IJH at all, and they are 97.2% of EFA by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares EFA and IJH. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch EFA vs IJH

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, EFA as of 2026-07-23, IJH as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.