FFFEX vs SMH: 0% overlap

Fidelity Freedom 2030 and VanEck Semiconductor ETF share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.0%
FFFEX expense ratio
0.71%
SMH expense ratio
0.35%

Top shared holdings

FFFEX and SMH hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FFFEXin SMHΔ

Where FFFEX and SMH differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFFFEXSMHΔ
Information Technology0.0%92.8%92.8pp
Unclassified99.4%7.2%+92.2pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.3%0.0%+0.3pp
Treasuries0.3%0.0%+0.3pp
Cash & Other0.0%0.0%+0.0pp

Δ is FFFEX minus SMH, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FFFEX
37 positions

99.9% of FFFEX by weight, held in no part of SMH.

Only in SMH
26 positions

100.0% of SMH by weight, held in no part of FFFEX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FFFEXSMH
Top 10 holdings70.9%72.2%
Positions held3826
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$71$35

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FFFEX and SMH overlap?

FFFEX and SMH overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FFFEX as of 2026-03-31, SMH as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between FFFEX and SMH calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FFFEX holds a stock at 6% and SMH holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FFFEX and SMH?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FFFEX own that SMH doesn't?

FFFEX holds 38 positions and SMH holds 26; 37 of FFFEX's positions don't appear in SMH at all, and they are 99.9% of FFFEX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FFFEX and SMH. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FFFEX vs SMH

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FFFEX as of 2026-03-31, SMH as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.