FSKAX vs SCHX: 88% overlap

Fidelity Total Market Index and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF share 88.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-05-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.1Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.1. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
88.3%
FSKAX expense ratio
0.01%
SCHX expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

FSKAX and SCHX hold 741 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FSKAXin SCHXΔ
NVDA6.5%7.5%1.0%
AAPL5.9%6.7%0.8%
MSFT4.4%4.9%0.5%
AMZN3.1%3.9%0.8%
GOOGL2.7%3.2%0.5%
AVGO2.3%3.1%0.8%
GOOG2.2%2.6%0.4%
META2.1%2.0%0.1%
TSLA1.7%1.8%0.1%
BRK-B1.4%1.3%0.1%

Where FSKAX and SCHX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFSKAXSCHXΔ
Information Technology29.9%36.8%6.9pp
Health Care9.8%8.1%+1.6pp
Industrials9.6%8.2%+1.4pp
Financials12.2%10.9%+1.3pp
Consumer Staples5.1%4.4%+0.7pp
Unclassified4.0%3.4%+0.6pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.7%0.1%+0.6pp
Real Estate2.4%1.9%+0.4pp

Δ is FSKAX minus SCHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FSKAX
3,012 positions

6.9% of FSKAX by weight, held in no part of SCHX.

Only in SCHX
8 positions

0.2% of SCHX by weight, held in no part of FSKAX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FSKAXSCHX
Top 10 holdings32.1%37.3%
Positions held3,754750
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$1$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FSKAX and SCHX overlap?

FSKAX and SCHX overlap 88.3% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 741 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, SCHX as of 2026-05-31).

How is the overlap between FSKAX and SCHX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSKAX holds a stock at 6% and SCHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FSKAX and SCHX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 88.3% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: FSKAX 0.01% versus SCHX 0.03%.

What does FSKAX own that SCHX doesn't?

FSKAX holds 3,754 positions and SCHX holds 750; 3,012 of FSKAX's positions don't appear in SCHX at all, and they are 6.9% of FSKAX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FSKAX and SCHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FSKAX vs SCHX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, SCHX as of 2026-05-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.