FSKAX vs SMH: 13% overlap
Fidelity Total Market Index and VanEck Semiconductor ETF share 12.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FSKAX and SMH hold 21 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FSKAX | in SMH | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 6.5% | 19.6% | 13.2% |
| AVGO | 2.3% | 7.8% | 5.5% |
| MU | 0.7% | 4.2% | 3.5% |
| AMD | 0.5% | 4.7% | 4.2% |
| AMAT | 0.4% | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| LRCX | 0.4% | 4.6% | 4.2% |
| INTC | 0.3% | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| KLAC | 0.3% | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| TXN | 0.3% | 4.6% | 4.3% |
| ADI | 0.3% | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Where FSKAX and SMH differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FSKAX | SMH | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 92.8% | −62.9pp |
| Financials | 12.2% | 0.0% | +12.2pp |
| Health Care | 9.8% | 0.0% | +9.8pp |
| Communication Services | 9.7% | 0.0% | +9.7pp |
| Industrials | 9.6% | 0.0% | +9.6pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 0.0% | +9.6pp |
| Consumer Staples | 5.1% | 0.0% | +5.1pp |
| Energy | 3.5% | 0.0% | +3.5pp |
Δ is FSKAX minus SMH, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
87.6% of FSKAX by weight, held in no part of SMH.
18.6% of SMH by weight, held in no part of FSKAX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FSKAX | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 32.1% | 72.2% |
| Positions held | 3,754 | 26 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $1 | $35 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FSKAX and SMH overlap?
FSKAX and SMH overlap 12.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 21 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, SMH as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between FSKAX and SMH calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSKAX holds a stock at 6% and SMH holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FSKAX and SMH?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 12.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FSKAX own that SMH doesn't?
FSKAX holds 3,754 positions and SMH holds 26; 3,732 of FSKAX's positions don't appear in SMH at all, and they are 87.6% of FSKAX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FSKAX and SMH. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FSKAX vs SMH
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, SMH as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.