FSKAX vs VB: 12% overlap

Fidelity Total Market Index and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF share 11.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
11.8%
FSKAX expense ratio
0.01%
VB expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

FSKAX and VB hold 1,214 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FSKAXin VBΔ
CASH0.7%1.7%1.0%
EQT0.1%0.2%0.1%
NRG0.1%0.4%0.3%
EME0.0%0.4%0.4%
INSM0.0%0.1%0.1%
TPR0.0%0.4%0.3%
TPL0.0%0.2%0.1%
ATO0.0%0.3%0.3%
NTRA0.0%0.4%0.4%
JBL0.0%0.5%0.4%

Where FSKAX and VB differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFSKAXVBΔ
Information Technology29.9%16.1%+13.8pp
Industrials9.6%21.0%11.4pp
Communication Services9.7%3.0%+6.7pp
Real Estate2.4%7.1%4.7pp
Materials1.8%5.3%3.6pp
Unclassified4.0%0.6%+3.4pp
Health Care9.8%11.9%2.1pp
Consumer Staples5.1%3.5%+1.6pp

Δ is FSKAX minus VB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FSKAX
2,539 positions

88.7% of FSKAX by weight, held in no part of VB.

Only in VB
94 positions

7.5% of VB by weight, held in no part of FSKAX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FSKAXVB
Top 10 holdings32.1%5.6%
Positions held3,7541,308
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$1$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FSKAX and VB overlap?

FSKAX and VB overlap 11.8% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1,214 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between FSKAX and VB calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSKAX holds a stock at 6% and VB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FSKAX and VB?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 11.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FSKAX own that VB doesn't?

FSKAX holds 3,754 positions and VB holds 1,308; 2,539 of FSKAX's positions don't appear in VB at all, and they are 88.7% of FSKAX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FSKAX and VB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FSKAX vs VB

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.