FSKAX vs VYM: 33% overlap

Fidelity Total Market Index and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF share 33.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.7Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
33.4%
FSKAX expense ratio
0.01%
VYM expense ratio
0.04%

Top shared holdings

FSKAX and VYM hold 548 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FSKAXin VYMΔ
AVGO2.3%7.3%5.0%
JPM1.2%3.4%2.2%
XOM1.0%2.4%1.4%
JNJ0.9%2.5%1.6%
ABBV0.6%1.8%1.2%
PG0.6%1.4%0.8%
HD0.6%1.5%0.9%
CVX0.5%1.3%0.7%
CAT0.5%2.0%1.5%
BAC0.5%1.6%1.1%

Where FSKAX and VYM differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFSKAXVYMΔ
Information Technology29.9%16.7%+13.1pp
Financials12.2%20.9%8.8pp
Communication Services9.7%3.1%+6.6pp
Energy3.5%8.5%5.1pp
Unclassified4.0%0.0%+3.9pp
Industrials9.6%13.2%3.6pp
Health Care9.8%13.1%3.3pp
Utilities2.4%5.7%3.3pp

Δ is FSKAX minus VYM, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FSKAX
3,205 positions

66.9% of FSKAX by weight, held in no part of VYM.

Only in VYM
58 positions

6.8% of VYM by weight, held in no part of FSKAX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FSKAXVYM
Top 10 holdings32.1%26.0%
Positions held3,754606
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$1$4

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FSKAX and VYM overlap?

FSKAX and VYM overlap 33.4% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 548 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, VYM as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between FSKAX and VYM calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSKAX holds a stock at 6% and VYM holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FSKAX and VYM?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 33.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FSKAX own that VYM doesn't?

FSKAX holds 3,754 positions and VYM holds 606; 3,205 of FSKAX's positions don't appear in VYM at all, and they are 66.9% of FSKAX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FSKAX and VYM. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FSKAX vs VYM

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FSKAX as of 2026-02-28, VYM as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.