FSPSX vs PRGFX: 1% overlap

Fidelity International Index and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock share 0.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.9%
FSPSX expense ratio
0.03%
PRGFX expense ratio
0.64%

Top shared holdings

FSPSX and PRGFX hold 4 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FSPSXin PRGFXΔ
LU17787629110.4%0.9%0.5%
NL00115851460.2%0.3%0.0%
81141R1000.2%0.3%0.1%
NL00129691820.1%0.2%0.1%

Where FSPSX and PRGFX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFSPSXPRGFXΔ
Unclassified98.0%5.9%+92.2pp
Information Technology0.0%48.2%48.2pp
Communication Services0.1%13.1%13.1pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%10.7%10.7pp
Health Care0.0%6.5%6.5pp
Industrials0.3%5.6%5.3pp
Financials0.1%5.1%5.0pp
Cash & Other0.0%3.5%3.5pp

Δ is FSPSX minus PRGFX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FSPSX
697 positions

99.5% of FSPSX by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.

Only in PRGFX
74 positions

95.0% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of FSPSX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FSPSXPRGFX
Top 10 holdings14.3%62.8%
Positions held70179
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$64

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FSPSX and PRGFX overlap?

FSPSX and PRGFX overlap 0.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 4 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between FSPSX and PRGFX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSPSX holds a stock at 6% and PRGFX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FSPSX and PRGFX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FSPSX own that PRGFX doesn't?

FSPSX holds 701 positions and PRGFX holds 79; 697 of FSPSX's positions don't appear in PRGFX at all, and they are 99.5% of FSPSX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FSPSX and PRGFX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FSPSX vs PRGFX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.