FSPSX vs SCHF: 70% overlap

Fidelity International Index and Schwab International Equity ETF share 69.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-05-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.3Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.3. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
69.6%
FSPSX expense ratio
0.03%
SCHF expense ratio
0.06%

Top shared holdings

FSPSX and SCHF hold 668 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FSPSXin SCHFΔ
NL00102732152.5%2.1%0.4%
GB00054052861.4%1.1%0.3%
CH00120052671.4%1.0%0.4%
GB00098952921.4%0.9%0.5%
CH00388633501.2%0.9%0.4%
GB00BP6MXD841.1%0.8%0.3%
DE00072361011.0%0.8%0.2%
AU000000BHP40.9%0.7%0.2%
JP39029000040.9%0.7%0.2%
JP36334000011.0%0.7%0.3%

Where FSPSX and SCHF differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFSPSXSCHFΔ
Unclassified98.0%95.9%+2.2pp
Financials0.1%1.9%1.8pp
Cash and/or Derivatives1.8%0.5%+1.3pp
Consumer Staples0.1%0.5%0.4pp
Energy0.0%0.2%0.2pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%0.2%0.2pp
Supranational0.0%0.1%0.1pp
Utilities0.0%0.1%0.1pp

Δ is FSPSX minus SCHF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FSPSX
33 positions

4.0% of FSPSX by weight, held in no part of SCHF.

Only in SCHF
808 positions

29.3% of SCHF by weight, held in no part of FSPSX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FSPSXSCHF
Top 10 holdings14.3%14.8%
Positions held7011,477
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$6

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FSPSX and SCHF overlap?

FSPSX and SCHF overlap 69.6% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 668 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, SCHF as of 2026-05-31).

How is the overlap between FSPSX and SCHF calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSPSX holds a stock at 6% and SCHF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FSPSX and SCHF?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 69.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FSPSX own that SCHF doesn't?

FSPSX holds 701 positions and SCHF holds 1,477; 33 of FSPSX's positions don't appear in SCHF at all, and they are 4.0% of FSPSX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FSPSX and SCHF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FSPSX vs SCHF

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, SCHF as of 2026-05-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.