FSPSX vs VB: 2% overlap

Fidelity International Index and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF share 1.7% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.7%
FSPSX expense ratio
0.03%
VB expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

FSPSX and VB hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FSPSXin VBΔ
CASH1.8%1.7%0.1%

Where FSPSX and VB differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFSPSXVBΔ
Unclassified98.0%0.6%+97.5pp
Industrials0.3%21.0%20.7pp
Information Technology0.0%16.1%16.1pp
Financials0.1%12.7%12.7pp
Health Care0.0%11.9%11.9pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%9.9%9.9pp
Real Estate0.0%7.1%7.1pp
Materials0.0%5.3%5.3pp

Δ is FSPSX minus VB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FSPSX
700 positions

98.6% of FSPSX by weight, held in no part of VB.

Only in VB
1,307 positions

98.3% of VB by weight, held in no part of FSPSX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FSPSXVB
Top 10 holdings14.3%5.6%
Positions held7011,308
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FSPSX and VB overlap?

FSPSX and VB overlap 1.7% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between FSPSX and VB calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FSPSX holds a stock at 6% and VB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FSPSX and VB?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.7% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FSPSX own that VB doesn't?

FSPSX holds 701 positions and VB holds 1,308; 700 of FSPSX's positions don't appear in VB at all, and they are 98.6% of FSPSX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FSPSX and VB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FSPSX vs VB

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FSPSX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.