FTIHX vs IWD: 0% overlap
Fidelity Total International Index and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF share 0.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FTIHX and IWD hold 13 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FTIHX | in IWD | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 2.7% | 0.1% | 2.7% |
| SUNB | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| PPL | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| L | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| RBA | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| SCCO | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| QSR | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| GFL | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| BEPC | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| BAM | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where FTIHX and IWD differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FTIHX | IWD | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 94.6% | 0.0% | +94.6pp |
| Financials | 1.3% | 19.6% | −18.2pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 18.0% | −18.0pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.7% | −12.7pp |
| Industrials | 0.4% | 11.3% | −10.9pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.3% | 10.2% | −9.9pp |
| Consumer Staples | 0.4% | 7.4% | −7.0pp |
| Energy | 0.2% | 6.1% | −5.9pp |
Δ is FTIHX minus IWD, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
97.2% of FTIHX by weight, held in no part of IWD.
99.4% of IWD by weight, held in no part of FTIHX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FTIHX | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 14.4% | 27.8% |
| Positions held | 5,057 | 872 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $19 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FTIHX and IWD overlap?
FTIHX and IWD overlap 0.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 13 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, IWD as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between FTIHX and IWD calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FTIHX holds a stock at 6% and IWD holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FTIHX and IWD?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FTIHX own that IWD doesn't?
FTIHX holds 5,057 positions and IWD holds 872; 5,043 of FTIHX's positions don't appear in IWD at all, and they are 97.2% of FTIHX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FTIHX and IWD. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FTIHX vs IWD
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, IWD as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.