FTIHX vs PRGFX: 1% overlap
Fidelity Total International Index and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock share 0.7% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 30 days apart — PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-04-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FTIHX and PRGFX hold 5 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FTIHX | in PRGFX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| LU1778762911 | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| NL0011585146 | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| 81141R100 | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| NL0012969182 | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
Where FTIHX and PRGFX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FTIHX | PRGFX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 94.6% | 5.9% | +88.8pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 48.2% | −48.2pp |
| Communication Services | 0.2% | 13.1% | −12.9pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.3% | 10.7% | −10.4pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 6.5% | −6.4pp |
| Industrials | 0.4% | 5.6% | −5.2pp |
| Financials | 1.3% | 5.1% | −3.8pp |
| Cash & Other | 0.0% | 3.5% | −3.5pp |
Δ is FTIHX minus PRGFX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.7% of FTIHX by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.
94.4% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of FTIHX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FTIHX | PRGFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 14.4% | 62.8% |
| Positions held | 5,057 | 79 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $64 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FTIHX and PRGFX overlap?
FTIHX and PRGFX overlap 0.7% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 5 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between FTIHX and PRGFX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FTIHX holds a stock at 6% and PRGFX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FTIHX and PRGFX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.7% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FTIHX own that PRGFX doesn't?
FTIHX holds 5,057 positions and PRGFX holds 79; 5,051 of FTIHX's positions don't appear in PRGFX at all, and they are 99.7% of FTIHX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FTIHX and PRGFX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FTIHX vs PRGFX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.