FTIHX vs SWISX: 50% overlap
Fidelity Total International Index and Schwab International Index share 49.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FTIHX and SWISX hold 685 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FTIHX | in SWISX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL0010273215 | 1.3% | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| GB0005405286 | 0.7% | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| GB0009895292 | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| CH1499059983 | 0.7% | 1.3% | 0.7% |
| CH0012005267 | 0.6% | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| CASH | 2.7% | 0.6% | 2.1% |
| CH0038863350 | 0.6% | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| GB00BP6MXD84 | 0.6% | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| DE0007236101 | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| AU000000CBA7 | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% |
Where FTIHX and SWISX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FTIHX | SWISX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 94.6% | 99.1% | −4.4pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 2.7% | 0.6% | +2.1pp |
| Financials | 1.3% | 0.0% | +1.3pp |
| Consumer Staples | 0.4% | 0.0% | +0.4pp |
| Industrials | 0.4% | 0.0% | +0.4pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3pp |
| Communication Services | 0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2pp |
| Energy | 0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2pp |
Δ is FTIHX minus SWISX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
48.4% of FTIHX by weight, held in no part of SWISX.
0.6% of SWISX by weight, held in no part of FTIHX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FTIHX | SWISX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 14.4% | 13.3% |
| Positions held | 5,057 | 694 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $6 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FTIHX and SWISX overlap?
FTIHX and SWISX overlap 49.9% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 685 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, SWISX as of 2026-04-30).
How is the overlap between FTIHX and SWISX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FTIHX holds a stock at 6% and SWISX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FTIHX and SWISX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 49.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FTIHX own that SWISX doesn't?
FTIHX holds 5,057 positions and SWISX holds 694; 4,371 of FTIHX's positions don't appear in SWISX at all, and they are 48.4% of FTIHX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FTIHX and SWISX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FTIHX vs SWISX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, SWISX as of 2026-04-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.