FXAIX vs JEPI: 34% overlap
Fidelity 500 Index and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF share 33.7% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — FXAIX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FXAIX and JEPI hold 104 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FXAIX | in JEPI | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.3% | 1.4% | 5.9% |
| AMZN | 3.5% | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| AAPL | 6.6% | 1.4% | 5.2% |
| GOOGL | 3.1% | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| AVGO | 2.6% | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| MSFT | 5.0% | 1.3% | 3.7% |
| META | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| JNJ | 1.0% | 1.7% | 0.7% |
| WMT | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.5% |
| V | 0.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% |
Where FXAIX and JEPI differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FXAIX | JEPI | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 31.8% | 13.5% | +18.3pp |
| Unclassified | 3.3% | 19.6% | −16.3pp |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 5.2% | +5.4pp |
| Financials | 12.0% | 8.5% | +3.5pp |
| Utilities | 2.4% | 5.4% | −3.0pp |
| Consumer Staples | 5.4% | 7.8% | −2.5pp |
| Health Care | 9.6% | 11.6% | −2.0pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 0.3% | 1.2% | −0.9pp |
Δ is FXAIX minus JEPI, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
42.9% of FXAIX by weight, held in no part of JEPI.
14.5% of JEPI by weight, held in no part of FXAIX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FXAIX | JEPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 36.4% | 15.7% |
| Positions held | 506 | 120 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $1 | $35 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FXAIX and JEPI overlap?
FXAIX and JEPI overlap 33.7% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 104 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FXAIX as of 2026-02-28, JEPI as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between FXAIX and JEPI calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FXAIX holds a stock at 6% and JEPI holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FXAIX and JEPI?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 33.7% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FXAIX own that JEPI doesn't?
FXAIX holds 506 positions and JEPI holds 120; 401 of FXAIX's positions don't appear in JEPI at all, and they are 42.9% of FXAIX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FXAIX and JEPI. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FXAIX vs JEPI
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FXAIX as of 2026-02-28, JEPI as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.