FZROX vs IEMG: 1% overlap

Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF share 0.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FZROX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.6%
FZROX expense ratio
0.00%
IEMG expense ratio
0.09%

Top shared holdings

FZROX and IEMG hold 40 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FZROXin IEMGΔ
CASH0.6%0.4%0.3%
HAL0.1%0.1%0.0%
BDX0.1%0.0%0.0%
MOH0.0%0.0%0.0%
SM0.0%0.0%0.0%
NXST0.0%0.0%0.0%
TRU0.0%0.0%0.0%
CCL0.0%0.0%0.0%
MRP0.0%0.0%0.0%
ECL0.1%0.0%0.1%

Where FZROX and IEMG differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFZROXIEMGΔ
Information Technology32.3%39.8%7.5pp
Financials11.8%18.1%6.3pp
Health Care8.6%3.1%+5.5pp
Communication Services10.1%5.4%+4.7pp
Materials1.6%5.8%4.2pp
Unclassified3.8%0.0%+3.8pp
Consumer Staples4.6%3.0%+1.7pp
Industrials9.2%7.7%+1.5pp

Δ is FZROX minus IEMG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FZROX
2,644 positions

99.1% of FZROX by weight, held in no part of IEMG.

Only in IEMG
2,749 positions

98.2% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of FZROX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FZROXIEMG
Top 10 holdings34.0%33.6%
Positions held2,6852,790
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$0$9

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FZROX and IEMG overlap?

FZROX and IEMG overlap 0.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 40 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FZROX as of 2026-04-30, IEMG as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between FZROX and IEMG calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FZROX holds a stock at 6% and IEMG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FZROX and IEMG?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FZROX own that IEMG doesn't?

FZROX holds 2,685 positions and IEMG holds 2,790; 2,644 of FZROX's positions don't appear in IEMG at all, and they are 99.1% of FZROX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FZROX and IEMG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FZROX vs IEMG

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FZROX as of 2026-04-30, IEMG as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.