FZROX vs RGAGX: 48% overlap

Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index and American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 share 48.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-04-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.5Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
48.2%
FZROX expense ratio
0.00%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%

Top shared holdings

FZROX and RGAGX hold 227 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FZROXin RGAGXΔ
NVDA6.9%6.1%0.9%
MSFT4.3%4.0%0.3%
GOOGL3.2%2.9%0.3%
AMZN3.7%2.9%0.8%
AVGO2.8%4.3%1.4%
GOOG2.6%2.9%0.4%
META1.9%4.2%2.3%
AAPL5.7%1.8%3.9%
TSLA1.5%2.6%1.1%
LLY1.1%3.3%2.3%

Where FZROX and RGAGX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFZROXRGAGXΔ
Financials11.8%6.5%+5.3pp
Unclassified3.8%7.6%3.8pp
Communication Services10.1%13.2%3.1pp
Consumer Discretionary9.6%12.7%3.1pp
Health Care8.6%11.0%2.3pp
Consumer Staples4.6%2.4%+2.2pp
Utilities2.3%0.5%+1.8pp
Real Estate2.3%0.6%+1.7pp

Δ is FZROX minus RGAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FZROX
2,457 positions

32.8% of FZROX by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

Only in RGAGX
81 positions

18.5% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of FZROX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FZROXRGAGX
Top 10 holdings34.0%36.7%
Positions held2,685309
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$0$30

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FZROX and RGAGX overlap?

FZROX and RGAGX overlap 48.2% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 227 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FZROX as of 2026-04-30, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between FZROX and RGAGX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FZROX holds a stock at 6% and RGAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FZROX and RGAGX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 48.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FZROX own that RGAGX doesn't?

FZROX holds 2,685 positions and RGAGX holds 309; 2,457 of FZROX's positions don't appear in RGAGX at all, and they are 32.8% of FZROX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FZROX and RGAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FZROX vs RGAGX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FZROX as of 2026-04-30, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.