FZROX vs SWISX: 1% overlap

Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index and Schwab International Index share 0.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.6%
FZROX expense ratio
0.00%
SWISX expense ratio
0.06%

Top shared holdings

FZROX and SWISX hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FZROXin SWISXΔ
CASH0.6%0.6%0.0%

Where FZROX and SWISX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFZROXSWISXΔ
Unclassified3.8%99.1%95.3pp
Information Technology32.3%0.0%+32.3pp
Financials11.8%0.0%+11.8pp
Communication Services10.1%0.0%+10.1pp
Consumer Discretionary9.6%0.0%+9.6pp
Industrials9.2%0.0%+9.2pp
Health Care8.6%0.0%+8.6pp
Consumer Staples4.6%0.0%+4.6pp

Δ is FZROX minus SWISX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FZROX
2,683 positions

99.7% of FZROX by weight, held in no part of SWISX.

Only in SWISX
692 positions

99.1% of SWISX by weight, held in no part of FZROX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FZROXSWISX
Top 10 holdings34.0%13.3%
Positions held2,685694
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$0$6

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FZROX and SWISX overlap?

FZROX and SWISX overlap 0.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FZROX as of 2026-04-30, SWISX as of 2026-04-30).

How is the overlap between FZROX and SWISX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FZROX holds a stock at 6% and SWISX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FZROX and SWISX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FZROX own that SWISX doesn't?

FZROX holds 2,685 positions and SWISX holds 694; 2,683 of FZROX's positions don't appear in SWISX at all, and they are 99.7% of FZROX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FZROX and SWISX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FZROX vs SWISX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FZROX as of 2026-04-30, SWISX as of 2026-04-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.