FZROX vs XLU: 2% overlap
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund share 2.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FZROX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FZROX and XLU hold 31 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FZROX | in XLU | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| NEE | 0.3% | 12.9% | 12.6% |
| SO | 0.2% | 7.5% | 7.4% |
| DUK | 0.1% | 7.0% | 6.8% |
| CEG | 0.1% | 6.1% | 5.9% |
| AEP | 0.1% | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| SRE | 0.1% | 4.2% | 4.1% |
| D | 0.1% | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| ETR | 0.1% | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| VST | 0.1% | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Where FZROX and XLU differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FZROX | XLU | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 2.3% | 99.7% | −97.4pp |
| Information Technology | 32.3% | 0.0% | +32.3pp |
| Financials | 11.8% | 0.0% | +11.8pp |
| Communication Services | 10.1% | 0.0% | +10.1pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 0.0% | +9.6pp |
| Industrials | 9.2% | 0.0% | +9.2pp |
| Health Care | 8.6% | 0.0% | +8.6pp |
| Consumer Staples | 4.6% | 0.0% | +4.6pp |
Δ is FZROX minus XLU, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
97.7% of FZROX by weight, held in no part of XLU.
1.9% of XLU by weight, held in no part of FZROX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FZROX | XLU | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 34.0% | 58.0% |
| Positions held | 2,685 | 33 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $0 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FZROX and XLU overlap?
FZROX and XLU overlap 2.3% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 31 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FZROX as of 2026-04-30, XLU as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between FZROX and XLU calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FZROX holds a stock at 6% and XLU holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FZROX and XLU?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.3% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FZROX own that XLU doesn't?
FZROX holds 2,685 positions and XLU holds 33; 2,653 of FZROX's positions don't appear in XLU at all, and they are 97.7% of FZROX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FZROX and XLU. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FZROX vs XLU
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FZROX as of 2026-04-30, XLU as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.