IEFA vs TRRIX: 0% overlap
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — TRRIX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
IEFA and TRRIX hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in IEFA | in TRRIX | Δ |
|---|
Where IEFA and TRRIX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | IEFA | TRRIX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 100.0% | −100.0pp |
| Financials | 24.2% | 0.0% | +24.2pp |
| Industrials | 19.6% | 0.0% | +19.6pp |
| Information Technology | 11.9% | 0.0% | +11.9pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.8% | 0.0% | +8.8pp |
| Health Care | 7.6% | 0.0% | +7.6pp |
| Consumer Staples | 6.7% | 0.0% | +6.7pp |
| Materials | 6.4% | 0.0% | +6.4pp |
Δ is IEFA minus TRRIX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.6% of IEFA by weight, held in no part of TRRIX.
100.0% of TRRIX by weight, held in no part of IEFA.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| IEFA | TRRIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 12.5% | 71.7% |
| Positions held | 2,567 | 26 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $7 | $51 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do IEFA and TRRIX overlap?
IEFA and TRRIX overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IEFA as of 2026-07-23, TRRIX as of 2026-02-28).
How is the overlap between IEFA and TRRIX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IEFA holds a stock at 6% and TRRIX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both IEFA and TRRIX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does IEFA own that TRRIX doesn't?
IEFA holds 2,567 positions and TRRIX holds 26; 2,566 of IEFA's positions don't appear in TRRIX at all, and they are 99.6% of IEFA by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares IEFA and TRRIX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch IEFA vs TRRIX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, IEFA as of 2026-07-23, TRRIX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.