IEMG vs VTTHX: 9% overlap

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 share 9.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VTTHX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
9.2%
IEMG expense ratio
0.09%
VTTHX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

IEMG and VTTHX hold 2,500 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin IEMGin VTTHXΔ
233013.4%1.2%12.3%
0059306.3%0.6%5.7%
0006605.3%0.6%4.7%
CASH0.4%1.9%1.5%
7002.6%0.2%2.3%
99881.8%0.1%1.7%
24541.3%0.1%1.1%
23080.8%0.1%0.8%
0059350.8%0.1%0.7%
4023400.6%0.1%0.5%

Where IEMG and VTTHX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorIEMGVTTHXΔ
Information Technology39.8%19.5%+20.3pp
Unclassified0.0%11.2%11.2pp
Treasuries0.0%11.2%11.2pp
Financials18.1%12.0%+6.0pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%4.7%4.7pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%3.6%3.6pp
Materials5.8%2.2%+3.6pp
Consumer Discretionary8.5%5.7%+2.9pp

Δ is IEMG minus VTTHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in IEMG
289 positions

3.1% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of VTTHX.

Only in VTTHX
14,182 positions

88.7% of VTTHX by weight, held in no part of IEMG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

IEMGVTTHX
Top 10 holdings33.6%26.4%
Positions held2,7906
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$9$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do IEMG and VTTHX overlap?

IEMG and VTTHX overlap 9.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 2,500 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IEMG as of 2026-07-23, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between IEMG and VTTHX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IEMG holds a stock at 6% and VTTHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both IEMG and VTTHX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 9.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does IEMG own that VTTHX doesn't?

IEMG holds 2,790 positions and VTTHX holds 6; 289 of IEMG's positions don't appear in VTTHX at all, and they are 3.1% of IEMG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares IEMG and VTTHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch IEMG vs VTTHX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, IEMG as of 2026-07-23, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.