IEMG vs VTWNX: 5% overlap

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 share 4.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VTWNX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
4.9%
IEMG expense ratio
0.09%
VTWNX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

IEMG and VTWNX hold 2,500 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin IEMGin VTWNXΔ
233013.4%0.6%12.8%
CASH0.4%1.7%1.3%
0059306.3%0.3%6.0%
0006605.3%0.3%5.0%
7002.6%0.1%2.5%
99881.8%0.1%1.7%
24541.3%0.1%1.2%
23080.8%0.0%0.8%
0059350.8%0.0%0.7%
72030.0%0.1%0.0%

Where IEMG and VTWNX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorIEMGVTWNXΔ
Information Technology39.8%10.0%+29.8pp
Unclassified0.0%29.8%29.8pp
Treasuries0.0%17.1%17.1pp
Financials18.1%8.2%+9.9pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%7.2%7.2pp
Consumer Discretionary8.5%2.9%+5.6pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%5.5%5.5pp
Materials5.8%1.1%+4.6pp

Δ is IEMG minus VTWNX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in IEMG
289 positions

3.1% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of VTWNX.

Only in VTWNX
14,183 positions

93.5% of VTWNX by weight, held in no part of IEMG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

IEMGVTWNX
Top 10 holdings33.6%44.9%
Positions held2,7907
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$9$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do IEMG and VTWNX overlap?

IEMG and VTWNX overlap 4.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 2,500 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IEMG as of 2026-07-23, VTWNX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between IEMG and VTWNX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IEMG holds a stock at 6% and VTWNX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both IEMG and VTWNX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 4.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does IEMG own that VTWNX doesn't?

IEMG holds 2,790 positions and VTWNX holds 7; 289 of IEMG's positions don't appear in VTWNX at all, and they are 3.1% of IEMG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares IEMG and VTWNX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch IEMG vs VTWNX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, IEMG as of 2026-07-23, VTWNX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.