ITOT vs SCHD: 7% overlap
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF share 7.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — SCHD as of 2026-05-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
ITOT and SCHD hold 96 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in ITOT | in SCHD | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | 0.5% | 5.1% | 4.6% |
| CVX | 0.5% | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| PG | 0.5% | 3.5% | 3.1% |
| HD | 0.4% | 3.4% | 2.9% |
| MRK | 0.4% | 3.9% | 3.4% |
| KO | 0.4% | 4.0% | 3.5% |
| TXN | 0.4% | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| AMGN | 0.3% | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| PEP | 0.3% | 3.4% | 3.2% |
| VZ | 0.3% | 3.7% | 3.4% |
Where ITOT and SCHD differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | ITOT | SCHD | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 35.2% | 12.9% | +22.2pp |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 18.4% | −14.0pp |
| Energy | 3.5% | 14.6% | −11.0pp |
| Health Care | 9.7% | 18.3% | −8.6pp |
| Financials | 12.7% | 8.8% | +3.8pp |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 2.9% | −2.9pp |
| Communication Services | 8.7% | 6.0% | +2.7pp |
| Real Estate | 2.3% | 0.0% | +2.3pp |
Δ is ITOT minus SCHD, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
92.6% of ITOT by weight, held in no part of SCHD.
3.0% of SCHD by weight, held in no part of ITOT.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| ITOT | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 32.7% | 43.6% |
| Positions held | 2,440 | 101 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $6 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do ITOT and SCHD overlap?
ITOT and SCHD overlap 7.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 96 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ITOT as of 2026-07-23, SCHD as of 2026-05-31).
How is the overlap between ITOT and SCHD calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ITOT holds a stock at 6% and SCHD holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both ITOT and SCHD?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 7.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does ITOT own that SCHD doesn't?
ITOT holds 2,440 positions and SCHD holds 101; 2,343 of ITOT's positions don't appear in SCHD at all, and they are 92.6% of ITOT by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares ITOT and SCHD. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch ITOT vs SCHD
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, ITOT as of 2026-07-23, SCHD as of 2026-05-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.