ITOT vs XLV: 8% overlap
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund share 8.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
ITOT and XLV hold 60 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in ITOT | in XLV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLY | 1.3% | 16.1% | 14.8% |
| JNJ | 0.9% | 10.7% | 9.8% |
| ABBV | 0.6% | 7.8% | 7.2% |
| UNH | 0.5% | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| MRK | 0.4% | 5.5% | 5.1% |
| TMO | 0.3% | 3.6% | 3.4% |
| AMGN | 0.3% | 3.4% | 3.2% |
| ABT | 0.2% | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| GILD | 0.2% | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| PFE | 0.2% | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Where ITOT and XLV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | ITOT | XLV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 9.7% | 99.7% | −90.0pp |
| Information Technology | 35.2% | 0.0% | +35.2pp |
| Financials | 12.7% | 0.0% | +12.7pp |
| Industrials | 10.1% | 0.0% | +10.1pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.8% | 0.0% | +8.8pp |
| Communication Services | 8.7% | 0.0% | +8.7pp |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 0.0% | +4.4pp |
| Energy | 3.5% | 0.0% | +3.5pp |
Δ is ITOT minus XLV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
91.7% of ITOT by weight, held in no part of XLV.
0.0% of XLV by weight, held in no part of ITOT.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| ITOT | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 32.7% | 62.0% |
| Positions held | 2,440 | 62 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do ITOT and XLV overlap?
ITOT and XLV overlap 8.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 60 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ITOT as of 2026-07-23, XLV as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between ITOT and XLV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ITOT holds a stock at 6% and XLV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both ITOT and XLV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 8.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does ITOT own that XLV doesn't?
ITOT holds 2,440 positions and XLV holds 62; 2,379 of ITOT's positions don't appear in XLV at all, and they are 91.7% of ITOT by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares ITOT and XLV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch ITOT vs XLV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, ITOT as of 2026-07-23, XLV as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.