IVW vs QQQM: 55% overlap

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF share 55.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — QQQM as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.4Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.4. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
55.1%
IVW expense ratio
0.18%
QQQM expense ratio
0.15%

Top shared holdings

IVW and QQQM hold 46 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin IVWin QQQMΔ
NVDA14.7%8.4%6.3%
AAPL6.9%7.6%0.7%
MSFT8.2%5.7%2.5%
META3.9%3.7%0.2%
GOOGL5.4%3.5%1.9%
AMZN3.5%4.4%0.8%
GOOG4.4%3.3%1.1%
AVGO5.4%2.9%2.5%
MU3.2%2.5%0.7%
AMD2.6%1.7%0.8%

Where IVW and QQQM differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorIVWQQQMΔ
Financials9.2%0.2%+8.9pp
Consumer Staples1.2%8.5%7.4pp
Consumer Discretionary8.0%11.9%3.9pp
Industrials6.6%3.0%+3.7pp
Information Technology52.5%48.9%+3.6pp
Unclassified0.0%2.7%2.7pp
Utilities0.4%1.6%1.2pp
Health Care6.3%5.2%+1.1pp

Δ is IVW minus QQQM, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in IVW
102 positions

28.8% of IVW by weight, held in no part of QQQM.

Only in QQQM
56 positions

29.1% of QQQM by weight, held in no part of IVW.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

IVWQQQM
Top 10 holdings58.2%46.7%
Positions held149103
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$18$15

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do IVW and QQQM overlap?

IVW and QQQM overlap 55.1% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 46 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IVW as of 2026-07-23, QQQM as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between IVW and QQQM calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IVW holds a stock at 6% and QQQM holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both IVW and QQQM?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 55.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does IVW own that QQQM doesn't?

IVW holds 149 positions and QQQM holds 103; 102 of IVW's positions don't appear in QQQM at all, and they are 28.8% of IVW by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares IVW and QQQM. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch IVW vs QQQM

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, IVW as of 2026-07-23, QQQM as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.