IVW vs SCHX: 63% overlap

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF share 62.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — SCHX as of 2026-05-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.4Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.4. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
62.5%
IVW expense ratio
0.18%
SCHX expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

IVW and SCHX hold 134 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin IVWin SCHXΔ
NVDA14.7%7.5%7.2%
AAPL6.9%6.7%0.2%
MSFT8.2%4.9%3.3%
AMZN3.5%3.9%0.3%
GOOGL5.4%3.2%2.2%
AVGO5.4%3.1%2.3%
GOOG4.4%2.6%1.8%
META3.9%2.0%1.8%
TSLA1.6%1.8%0.2%
MU3.2%1.6%1.6%

Where IVW and SCHX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorIVWSCHXΔ
Information Technology52.5%36.8%+15.8pp
Communication Services14.7%10.1%+4.7pp
Unclassified0.0%3.4%3.4pp
Consumer Staples1.2%4.4%3.3pp
Energy0.0%3.2%3.2pp
Health Care6.3%8.1%1.9pp
Financials9.2%10.9%1.8pp
Utilities0.4%2.0%1.6pp

Δ is IVW minus SCHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in IVW
14 positions

2.3% of IVW by weight, held in no part of SCHX.

Only in SCHX
615 positions

36.2% of SCHX by weight, held in no part of IVW.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

IVWSCHX
Top 10 holdings58.2%37.3%
Positions held149750
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$18$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do IVW and SCHX overlap?

IVW and SCHX overlap 62.5% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 134 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IVW as of 2026-07-23, SCHX as of 2026-05-31).

How is the overlap between IVW and SCHX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IVW holds a stock at 6% and SCHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both IVW and SCHX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 62.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does IVW own that SCHX doesn't?

IVW holds 149 positions and SCHX holds 750; 14 of IVW's positions don't appear in SCHX at all, and they are 2.3% of IVW by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares IVW and SCHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch IVW vs SCHX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, IVW as of 2026-07-23, SCHX as of 2026-05-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.