IVW vs VGT: 51% overlap
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and Vanguard Information Technology ETF share 51.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
IVW and VGT hold 41 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in IVW | in VGT | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 14.7% | 16.1% | 1.4% |
| MSFT | 8.2% | 8.3% | 0.1% |
| AAPL | 6.9% | 14.3% | 7.5% |
| AVGO | 5.4% | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| MU | 3.2% | 5.0% | 1.8% |
| AMD | 2.6% | 3.6% | 1.1% |
| AMAT | 1.3% | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| LRCX | 1.2% | 2.1% | 1.0% |
| KLAC | 0.8% | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| PLTR | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.2% |
Where IVW and VGT differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | IVW | VGT | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 52.5% | 99.5% | −46.9pp |
| Communication Services | 14.7% | 0.0% | +14.7pp |
| Financials | 9.2% | 0.0% | +9.2pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.0% | 0.0% | +8.0pp |
| Industrials | 6.6% | 0.0% | +6.6pp |
| Health Care | 6.3% | 0.0% | +6.3pp |
| Consumer Staples | 1.2% | 0.1% | +1.1pp |
| Real Estate | 0.7% | 0.0% | +0.7pp |
Δ is IVW minus VGT, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
47.4% of IVW by weight, held in no part of VGT.
24.4% of VGT by weight, held in no part of IVW.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| IVW | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 58.2% | 59.9% |
| Positions held | 149 | 322 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $18 | $9 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do IVW and VGT overlap?
IVW and VGT overlap 51.1% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 41 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IVW as of 2026-07-23, VGT as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between IVW and VGT calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IVW holds a stock at 6% and VGT holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both IVW and VGT?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 51.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does IVW own that VGT doesn't?
IVW holds 149 positions and VGT holds 322; 107 of IVW's positions don't appear in VGT at all, and they are 47.4% of IVW by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares IVW and VGT. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch IVW vs VGT
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, IVW as of 2026-07-23, VGT as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.