IWM vs TRRIX: 0% overlap
iShares Russell 2000 ETF and T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — TRRIX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
IWM and TRRIX hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in IWM | in TRRIX | Δ |
|---|
Where IWM and TRRIX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | IWM | TRRIX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 100.0% | −100.0pp |
| Health Care | 19.9% | 0.0% | +19.9pp |
| Financials | 19.0% | 0.0% | +19.0pp |
| Industrials | 14.7% | 0.0% | +14.7pp |
| Information Technology | 12.8% | 0.0% | +12.8pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.4% | 0.0% | +9.4pp |
| Energy | 6.1% | 0.0% | +6.1pp |
| Real Estate | 5.9% | 0.0% | +5.9pp |
Δ is IWM minus TRRIX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
100.0% of IWM by weight, held in no part of TRRIX.
100.0% of TRRIX by weight, held in no part of IWM.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| IWM | TRRIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 3.3% | 71.7% |
| Positions held | 1,967 | 26 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $19 | $51 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do IWM and TRRIX overlap?
IWM and TRRIX overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (IWM as of 2026-07-23, TRRIX as of 2026-02-28).
How is the overlap between IWM and TRRIX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If IWM holds a stock at 6% and TRRIX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both IWM and TRRIX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does IWM own that TRRIX doesn't?
IWM holds 1,967 positions and TRRIX holds 26; 1,966 of IWM's positions don't appear in TRRIX at all, and they are 100.0% of IWM by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares IWM and TRRIX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch IWM vs TRRIX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, IWM as of 2026-07-23, TRRIX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.