JEPI vs QQQM: 21% overlap
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF share 20.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 31 days apart — QQQM as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-03-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
JEPI and QQQM hold 27 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in JEPI | in QQQM | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | 1.4% | 3.4% | 1.9% |
| NVDA | 1.4% | 8.4% | 7.0% |
| AMZN | 1.4% | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| AAPL | 1.4% | 7.6% | 6.2% |
| GOOGL | 1.4% | 3.5% | 2.2% |
| AVGO | 1.3% | 2.9% | 1.6% |
| MSFT | 1.3% | 5.7% | 4.4% |
| PEP | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| META | 1.2% | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| ADI | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.3% |
Where JEPI and QQQM differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | JEPI | QQQM | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 13.5% | 48.9% | −35.5pp |
| Unclassified | 19.6% | 2.7% | +16.9pp |
| Communication Services | 5.2% | 15.6% | −10.5pp |
| Financials | 8.5% | 0.2% | +8.2pp |
| Health Care | 11.6% | 5.2% | +6.3pp |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 3.0% | +6.0pp |
| Utilities | 5.4% | 1.6% | +3.9pp |
| Real Estate | 2.9% | 0.1% | +2.8pp |
Δ is JEPI minus QQQM, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
72.8% of JEPI by weight, held in no part of QQQM.
45.2% of QQQM by weight, held in no part of JEPI.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| JEPI | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 15.7% | 46.7% |
| Positions held | 120 | 103 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $35 | $15 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do JEPI and QQQM overlap?
JEPI and QQQM overlap 20.6% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 27 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (JEPI as of 2026-03-31, QQQM as of 2026-02-28).
How is the overlap between JEPI and QQQM calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If JEPI holds a stock at 6% and QQQM holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both JEPI and QQQM?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 20.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does JEPI own that QQQM doesn't?
JEPI holds 120 positions and QQQM holds 103; 93 of JEPI's positions don't appear in QQQM at all, and they are 72.8% of JEPI by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares JEPI and QQQM. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch JEPI vs QQQM
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, JEPI as of 2026-03-31, QQQM as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.